Arrested During a First Amendment Audit? What to Do | Be My Own Attorney
Blog First Amendment

Arrested During a First Amendment Audit? Here's What to Do.

Being arrested during a lawful public activity is a constitutional injury. The steps you take in the hours and days after that arrest determine whether you can vindicate your rights — both in the criminal case and in any civil claim that follows.

Step 1: Say nothing except your name

The moment you're being detained or arrested, stop talking about the facts. You have the right to remain silent. Use it. Everything you say will be used against you — not as a figure of speech, but literally. Officers write reports. Those reports quote defendants. Those quotes appear at trial.

You may be required to provide your name in some states (stop-and-identify statutes). Beyond that: "I am invoking my right to remain silent. I want an attorney." Say it clearly, once, and repeat it if asked more questions. Don't explain yourself. Don't justify your activity. Don't argue about whether the arrest is lawful — that's for court, not for the roadside.

The instinct to explain — "I was just filming, I wasn't doing anything wrong, you can't arrest me for this" — is understandable but counterproductive. Your statements become evidence. Let the video be the evidence. The video doesn't accidentally incriminate you.

Step 2: Preserve every piece of footage

The footage from your audit is the most important evidence in your case. It may show that you were in a lawful location, that you were not interfering with police operations, that the officer gave no lawful order you failed to obey, or that the arrest was pretextual.

If your equipment was seized: document it. Note what was taken, by whom, and whether it was inventoried in an evidence report. You are entitled to the return of your property that is not evidence of a crime, and the footage itself is your property and potentially exculpatory evidence subject to Brady disclosure.

If footage was uploaded to a live stream, contact the platform or any viewers who may have captured it. Cloud backups, secondary cameras, witnesses with phones — identify every potential source immediately. Evidence disappears. People forget. Accounts get deleted. Act within 24-48 hours.

Step 3: Document the scene and your injuries

As soon as you're released, document everything about the encounter: the location, the officers involved (badge numbers if you got them, physical descriptions, patrol car numbers), any witnesses, the exact sequence of events as you remember it, and any physical injuries.

Photograph any injuries immediately — before they heal. Seek medical attention if warranted. Medical records documenting injuries from the arrest become evidence in any civil claim. Memory fades. Write a detailed account within 24 hours while it's fresh, noting every statement the officer made and in what order.

Step 4: Understand what you're facing

First Amendment auditor arrests typically result in charges like: disorderly conduct, obstruction of a governmental function, failure to obey a lawful order, interfering with a police officer, or trespass. These charges range from Class C misdemeanors (fine only) to Class A or B misdemeanors or even felonies in some circumstances.

The critical question for each charge: was there actually a lawful basis for it? Filming in a public space is constitutionally protected. Being present in a public space is lawful. Refusing to leave a public space you have every right to occupy is not obstruction. Whether the officer's order was "lawful" within the meaning of the obstruction statute depends on whether they had legal authority to give it.

Get your charging document and police report. Read them carefully against the actual elements of each charge. Then see Brief for a charge-by-charge analysis of what the prosecution must prove on your specific facts.

Step 5: Consider both the criminal case and the civil claim

A retaliatory arrest during a First Amendment audit may give rise to both a criminal defense (fighting the charges) and a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for First Amendment retaliation, unlawful arrest, or excessive force.

These cases run on different tracks, sometimes with different attorneys (civil rights attorneys often work on contingency). The criminal case must be resolved before a § 1983 claim based on the unlawfulness of the arrest can proceed in some circumstances (see Heck v. Humphrey). But claims based on excessive force during the arrest can proceed regardless of the criminal outcome.

If the hard part is finding or affording a lawyer willing to take an audit case, Fund the Auditor exists for exactly that gap — helping auditors connect with legal representation and the resources to pursue these claims.

For more on the civil side, see Section 1983 First Amendment retaliation claims and our page for First Amendment auditors.

We built this for exactly this situation

Be My Own Attorney is designed for the intersection of First Amendment rights and criminal charges. Brief analyzes your charges and evidence. Stand supports you in court. Both built for pro se defendants who understand their rights and need the tools to defend them.

Join the Waitlist

First Amendment Arrest FAQ

Legally, no — filming police performing their duties in a public space is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment in every federal circuit that has addressed the issue. Officers cannot lawfully arrest you solely for filming. However, officers do arrest people for filming — typically charging them with something else (obstruction, disorderly conduct) as a pretext. The arrest is the constitutional violation; the legal process is how you challenge it.
A retaliatory arrest is an arrest made because the person engaged in constitutionally protected activity — typically speech or expressive conduct — rather than because they actually violated a law. The Supreme Court recognized First Amendment retaliatory arrest claims in Nieves v. Bartlett (2019), though with the limitation that claims generally fail if there was probable cause for any arrest, unless you can show the law is selectively enforced against people exercising the same constitutional rights.
Police can seize property incident to arrest and as potential evidence. However, under Riley v. California (2014), they cannot search the contents of your phone without a warrant. Seizing the device is different from searching it. If your phone or camera was seized, document it and request its return promptly. Withholding exculpatory footage — footage on your device that disproves the charges — can be a Brady violation.
Many First Amendment auditors have strong constitutional knowledge and are well-positioned to handle misdemeanor charges pro se, particularly in JP courts where the constitutional issues are often the entire case. The considerations: how serious are the charges, how strong is your footage, and how comfortable are you with courtroom procedure. The more serious the charge, the more value a civil rights attorney adds — especially for the § 1983 civil claim that often has more value than the criminal defense.
Justice of the Peace courts handle Class C misdemeanors in Texas — the lowest level of criminal offense, punishable by fine only. Many first-contact arrests during audits result in Class C charges tried in JP court. Critically, JP judges in Texas are not required to be attorneys. They're elected officials with no minimum legal education. Understanding how your specific JP judge actually behaves — their procedural preferences, how they handle pro se defendants, their willingness to engage with constitutional arguments — is essential preparation.